DAC Beachcroft's Accountancy Newsletter features topical issues for our clients and contacts
Back
Where we are
Back
Back
Back
Back
Insurance
3 min read
By Richard Highley & Francesca Muscutt
|Published 09 February 2024
DAC Beachcroft's Accountancy Newsletter features topical issues for our clients and contacts
It has been a turbulent time for the audit industry, and this industry – perhaps above all others – is one where the regulator sets the tone. Our article reflects back on the FRC's activity in 2023 to see what themes can be drawn out.
The recent Court of Appeal decision in Al Sadeq v Dechert LLP provides helpful clarification on the scope of legal professional privilege. In particular, it confirms litigation privilege is not confined to parties to the litigation and legal advice privilege can apply in an investigatory context if lawyers are instructed to provide legal expertise in the context of the investigation and the investigation itself is conducted in a legal context. We consider the implications of this judgment for accountancy firms facing possible or actual investigation by their regulator and the steps they can take to ensure privilege is maintained.
With the FRC, NGOs and other organisations scrutinising the TCFD aligned disclosures, climate risks need to be properly accounted for in financial statements and auditors need to ensure any material impacts of climate change are properly reflected in financial statements. Our article provides some practical tips to auditors on how to manage the evolving risks in this space.
The recent Amathus Drinks decision illustrates the potential limitations of Bannerman clauses and that there may be certain circumstances in which a professional adviser will owe a duty of care notwithstanding the inclusion of an express disclaimer clause in its retainer.
The FRC's investigations into the audits of Carillion resulted in eye-watering fines being handed out. Will the FRC's new Executive Counsel, Richard Moriarty, bring in a change in emphasis away from ever harsher sanctions, and towards alternative routes on driving up audit quality? Please read our article for more details.
In a landmark decision, James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council, the Court of Appeal has ruled that the courts can stay proceedings and order parties to engage in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), even where one or both parties have expressed an unwillingness to engage in the process. We consider the implications of this decision for professional advisers, such as accountants and auditors, who find themselves defending allegations of negligence, and consider how the judgment may help them achieve an early resolution of the dispute.
The Supreme Court in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter has clarified what is meant by the phrases “deliberately concealed” and “deliberate commission of a breach of duty” in the context of section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980. The decision, which marks a return to giving the words used in s32 of Limitation Act 1980 their ordinary meaning, will be welcomed by professionals advisors such as accountants, and their insurers.
Authors
Richard Highley
Partner
London
Francesca Muscutt
Senior Knowledge Lawyer
London
Francesca Muscutt
Senior Knowledge Lawyer
London
+44 (0)20 7894 6189
fmuscutt@dacbeachcroft.com
Key Contacts
Richard Highley
Partner
London
Rebecca Smith
Partner
Bristol
Julian Bubb Humfryes
Senior Associate
London
Julian Bubb Humfryes
Senior Associate
London
+44(0)20 7894 6137
jhumfryes@dacbeachcroft.com
Phil Murrin
Partner
London
Hannah Gregory
Legal Director
Bristol
Jenny Eacott
Lawyer
Bristol
Victoria Grantham
Senior Associate
London
Millie Bailey
Solicitor
London